Place An Order
RE Agents
Services
Recent News
Full Stream Ahead
Realtor.com & More
Video Podcast
List Your Home
Register for Free Video
FAQ's
About us
Mustang

Place An Order
RE Agents
Services
Recent News
Full Stream Ahead
Realtor.com & More
Video Podcast
List Your Home
Register for Free Video
FAQ's
About us
Mustang

 

For more info,

call us at

 (818) 224-4303

or email us at info@vidiOH.com

 

     
 
 

NAR Technology Survey Reveals Heavy Tech Investment By Realtors

RISMEDIA, May 15, 2006—The number of Realtors® with Web sites has increased 129% over the past five years, and many of the sites display property listings, according to a new survey by the National Association of Realtors®.

The 2006 Realtor® Technology Survey, conducted by NAR’s Center for REALTOR® Technology, reveals that the Internet ranks third in generating leads, behind referrals and repeat clients, and ahead of community involvement. The survey also shows that there is a clear connection between technology spending and Internet-generated leads, and that getting leads from the Internet continues to grow.

Realtors® have invested heavily in Internet technology and security, through Multiple Listing Systems and individually, in the past several years. For example, the survey showed that thus far in 2006, 56 percent of agents spent more than $1,000 apiece on technology and that 30 percent spent $2,000 or more. In addition, 16 percent of agents and 28 percent of brokers are now spending more than $1,000 annually on their Web sites. Realtors® with personal business Web sites – not including an area on a broker’s site – was 71 percent in 2006, compared to 31 percent in 2002, showing a jump of 129 percent.

“Consumers are able to use information portals to look for homes to buy because Realtors® have invested huge amounts of resources in technology to make accurate information available on secure sites, thus bringing added value to the transaction. All this information is available to consumers, free of charge, 24 hours a day,” said Thomas M. Stevens, 2006 NAR president and senior vice president of NRT Inc., from Vienna, Va.

The survey also showed that the amount of investment in Web sites has a direct relationship to the number of leads coming from the Internet. Thus, 40 percent of those who spent more than $5,000 on their Web site showed that more than 60 percent of their leads come from the Internet.

Realtors® are also reacting more quickly to online inquiries. In a surprising change from past surveys and findings, over half the survey respondents indicated that it takes them less than two hours to respond to an Internet inquiry, and only 2 percent indicated that it took them more than a day to respond. That compares with a 2004 survey showing that only 27 percent of practitioners responded within eight hours to an online inquiry and 46 percent of inquiries received no responses.

“While the survey indicates that the vast majority of Realtors® take steps to protect themselves and the listing information provided by their clients and customers, more work remains to be done,” said Mark Lesswing, NAR vice president and director of CRT. “Less than a third of respondents have received information security education from their MLS or brokerage. Only one-third are aware of written security policies that they must follow and less than half have a written privacy policy. Programs like CRT’s REALTOR® Secure can definitely play a role here.”

The survey shows that use of automated transaction management systems, used to electronically monitor each step of the real estate process, continues to rise, moving from 13 percent in 2005 to 26 percent in 2006, with 70 percent of users saying they are satisfied with their applications.

The survey was based on data from field research conducted in April of this year. CRT e-mailed the survey to 20,000 NAR members, including agents and brokers and generated 719 usable responses. The 2006 study is available by clicking here.

NAR’s Center for REALTOR® Technology was established to provide technology leadership, guidance and assistance for NAR members; CRT makes available informed industry insight, research and open-source applications through its mission of implementation, advocacy and information. Information about CRT is available at www.realtor.org/crt.


Newspaper Sales Fall, Web Traffic Increases

Doug Calvery, Web Pro News

May 10, 2006

Newspapers' websites are receiving more hits than ever, but paper subscriptions are falling throughout the industry. Nielson and NetRatings report that traffic to newspaper sites increased roughly 8% from 2005 to 2006, with 56 million Internet users dropping by.

But in paper sales, weekday subscriptions have fallen 2.5%, and Sunday circulations have decreased even more, by 3.1%. This means that 45.4 million and 48.5 million readers, respectively, still buy the physical copies, according to the Newspaper Association of America (NAA).

Younger people are driving this development, as they increasingly prefer to reference cable TV and the Web for their news. This trend began in the 1980s, and as industry analyst John Morton says, "It isn't likely to change."

Paper sales did not uniformly decrease, though. A few of the major newspapers eked out minor gains, with USA TODAY's sales increasing by 0.1%, The New York Times managing a 0.5% growth, and the Chicago Tribune increasing circulation by 0.9%.

Other benchmark newspapers showed drastic declines. The Los Angeles Times lost 9.1%, The Boston Herald dropped by 9.1%, and The San Francisco Chronicle fell off a small cliff, with sales decreasing by 15.6%.

Despite these depressing numbers, investors seem optimistic. In the same period, McLatchy's stock price increased by 3.2%, the New York Times Co. rose by 4.6%, and Tribune Co. shares showed an increase of 6.5%. It remains unknown how much of these increases might be due to the increasing Web traffic.

The NAA advised watch groups to consider the Internet numbers in addition to paper circulation, which is usually taken as the key benchmark of newspapers' performance. It will be the NAA's mission in the future to convince advertisers that a strong Web showing can be just as important.
 


Two-Thirds of Active US Web Population Using Broadband
up 28% Year-Over-Year to an All-Time High, According to Nielsen//NetRatings
March 14, 2006
Video Sharing Sites - MSN Video, YouTube and Google Video - Benefit From
                        Broadband Penetration Increase

    NEW YORK, March 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Nielsen//NetRatings, a global
leader in Internet media and market research, announced today that the number
of active broadband users from home increased 28 percent year-over-year, from
74.3 million in February 2005 to 95.5 million in February 2006. Broadband
composition among the U.S. active online population has seen vigorous growth
during the past three years, increasing at least ten percentage points
annually and hitting an all-time high of 68 percent for active Internet users
in February 2006.
    From February 2003 to February 2004, broadband composition grew twelve
percentage points, from 33 percent to 45 percent (see Table 1). In February
2005, it increased another ten percentage points to 55 percent. This year,
February saw broadband composition reach an all-time high of 68 percent,
increasing an impressive 13 percentage points over the previous February.
    Overall Internet penetration in the U.S. has stabilized over the past few
years, reaching 74 percent at home in February 2006.
    As broadband penetration increases, so does the average PC time spent per
person. With fast connections to Web sites for online photos, audio and video
files, online visitors are devoting more time to their computers. Since
February 2003, the average PC time per person among active Web users has
increased approximately five hours from 25 and a half hours a month to 30 and
a half hours a month.
    "The correlated growth in average PC time per person is the result of
broadband users' greater satisfaction with their online experience," said Jon
Gibs, senior director of media, Nielsen//NetRatings. "The 'always on' nature
of a broadband connection allows the Internet to become more entrenched in
consumers' lives. In broadband consumers' minds, activities such as checking
account balances, downloading music, watching streaming video and checking
email become just another application of the PC rather than a separate
activity that happens when they log on to the Internet."

    Table 1: Growth in Broadband Composition and PC Time among Active Internet
Universe (U.S., Home Only)
    ____________________________________________________________________
                         U.S. Broadband                        PC Time
     Year               Composition (%)          Per Person (hh:mm:ss)
    ____________________________________________________________________
    Feb-03                           33                       25:33:24
    ____________________________________________________________________
    Feb-04                           45                       27:52:29
    ____________________________________________________________________
    Feb-05                           55                       27:49:58
    ____________________________________________________________________
    Feb-06                           68                       30:35:54
    ____________________________________________________________________

    Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, March 2006
    Note: Broadband data is based on individual, active Internet users 2 years
and older.

    Video Sharing Sites Enjoy Growing Popularity
    With increased broadband penetration, a growing trend is accessing
streaming media online at video sharing sites. MSN Video garnered 9.3 million
unique visitors in February 2006, growing 44 percent over the previous year
(see Table 2). YouTube and Google Video grew from relative obscurity in
February 2005 to substantial players in February 2006, drawing 9.0 million and
6.2 million unique visitors, respectively. iFilm and Yahoo's video search saw
triple digit year-over-year growth in their visitation, drawing 4.3 million
and 3.8 million unique visitors, respectively.
    "Video sites have successfully tapped into the use of viral campaigns,
capitalizing on consumers' impulse to share funny clips with their friends,"
said Gibs. "Among these sites, it is not uncommon to see dramatic spikes in
weekly Web traffic due to a popular online video that has been sent from
person to person.  Television networks should be looking to embrace, rather
than pull away from these sites, in order to generate buzz for their broadcast
programming."

    Table 2: Web Traffic to Video Sites, February 2006 (U.S., Home and Work)
    ____________________________________________________________________
     Video Site   Unique Audience (000)  Year Over Year Percent Change
    ____________________________________________________________________
    MSN Video                     9,279                            44%
    ____________________________________________________________________
    YouTube                       9,045                             NA
    ____________________________________________________________________
    Google Video                  6,246                             NA
    ____________________________________________________________________
    iFILM                         4,336                           102%
    ____________________________________________________________________
    video.search.yahoo.com        3,774                           148%
    ____________________________________________________________________

    Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, March 2006
    Note: This list is a sample of popular video sites and is not meant to be
exhaustive.

          *********************************************************

    Nielsen//NetRatings reports February 2006 data for the Top Sites by Parent
Company and Top Brands. In addition, Nielsen//NetRatings reveals the Top
Advertisers by Company for February 2006.

    Nielsen//NetRatings Top 10 Web Sites by Parent Company and Top 10 Web
Sites By Brand, February 2006

    Table 1. Top 10 Parent Companies,       Table 2. Top 10 Brands,
    Combined Home & Work                    Combined Home & Work
    ______________________________________  ________________________________

                         Unique  Time Per                Unique   Time Per
                       Audience    Person              Audience     Person
     Parent               (000) (hh:mm:ss)  Brand          (000) (hh:mm:ss)
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    1.  Microsoft        112,388  2:04:09  1.  Yahoo!   102,165    3:10:46
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    2.  Yahoo!           102,826  3:10:12  2.  Microsoft 95,555    0:46:13
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    3.  Time Warner      100,015  4:50:21  3.  MSN       91,622    1:43:51
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    4.  Google            90,490  0:54:31  4.  Google    89,059    0:53:11
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    5.  eBay              59,120  1:49:13  5.  AOL       73,289    6:00:13
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    6.  InterActiveCorp   55,906  0:25:58  6.  eBay      52,102    1:53:49
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    7.  News Corp. Online 52,767  1:23:37  7.  Amazon    38,994    0:21:14
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    8.  Amazon            45,693  0:23:59  8.  MapQuest  36,721    0:13:43
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    9.  Walt Disney                        9.  Ask Jeeves
        Internet Group    41,249  0:34:05      Network   34,259    0:25:29
    ______________________________________  ________________________________
    10. New York
        Times Company     38,559  0:15:37  10. Apple     34,211    1:04:13
    ______________________________________  ________________________________

    Example:  The data indicates that 38.6 million home and work Internet
users visited at least one of the New York Times Company-owned sites or
launched a New York Times Company-owned application during the month, and each
person spent, on average, a total of 15 minutes and 37 seconds at one or more
of their sites or applications.
    A parent company is defined as a consolidation of multiple domains and
URLs owned by a single entity. A brand is defined as a consolidation of
multiple domains and URLs that has a consistent collection of branded content.
Reach is a measure of the unduplicated audience that visits a property. The
data is expressed as the percentage of the total universe of Internet users
who logged onto the Internet at least once during the reporting period.

    Nielsen//NetRatings AdRelevance Top 10 Advertisers, February 2006
    Top advertisers, ranked by estimated spending, are based on data from
AdRelevance, Nielsen//NetRatings' advertising research service. An impression
is counted as the number of times an ad is rendered for viewing.

     Top 10 Advertisers by Estimated Spending
    ____________________________________________________________________
                                 Total Estimated
    Advertiser                          Spending      Impressions (000)
    ____________________________________________________________________
    1.  Vonage Holdings Corp         $23,022,500             9,473,806
    ____________________________________________________________________
    2.  Netflix, Inc.                $16,669,900             6,961,163
    ____________________________________________________________________
    3.  GUS Plc                      $16,144,200             9,264,565
    ____________________________________________________________________
    4.  LowerMyBills.com, Inc.       $12,075,000             2,439,032
    ____________________________________________________________________
    5.  Verizon Communications, Inc. $11,259,500             3,211,531
    ____________________________________________________________________
    6.  United Online, Inc.          $10,219,300             3,468,026
    ____________________________________________________________________
    7.  General Motors Corporation    $9,580,300             1,600,088
    ____________________________________________________________________
    8.  QuinStreet                    $9,389,800             1,880,501
    ____________________________________________________________________
    9.  NexTag.com                    $8,912,100             2,840,852
    ____________________________________________________________________
    10. Scottrade, Inc.               $8,893,200             1,789,189
    ____________________________________________________________________

    Estimated spending reflects CPM-based advertising online, and excludes
search-based advertising, paid fee services, performance-based campaigns,
sponsorships, barters, partnership advertising, advertorials, promotions and
email. Impressions reported exclude house ads, which are ads that run on an
advertiser's own or related property and co-branding relationships.

    Example:  An estimated 1.8 billion Scottrade, Inc. ads were rendered for
viewing at the cost of approximately $8.9 million during the surfing period.

    About Nielsen//NetRatings
    NetRatings, Inc. (Nasdaq: NTRT) delivers leading Internet media and market
research solutions, marketed globally under the Nielsen//NetRatings brand.
With high quality, technology-driven products and services,
Nielsen//NetRatings is the global standard for Internet audience measurement
and premier source for online advertising intelligence, enabling clients to
make informed business decisions regarding their Internet and digital
strategies. The Nielsen//NetRatings portfolio includes panel-based and
site-centric Internet audience measurement services, online advertising
intelligence, user lifestyle and demographic data, e-commerce and transaction
metrics, and custom data, research and analysis. For more information, please
visit http://www.nielsen-netratings.com.

    NetRatings, Inc.
                              Suzy Bausch (408) 941-2965
                              Jennifer Fan (408) 941-2951


SOURCE Nielsen//NetRatings
Web Site: http://www.nielsen-netratings.com
 
 

 

 

 

 

Three Reasons to Invest in Online Video

February 08, 2006

Userplane's Michael Jones explains why online video must be included in your marketing mix.

Thanks to online video ads, guys with bad hygiene and pathetic social skills can try wooing VH1 VJ Rachel Perry-- and they even get a well-mannered response. Ah, the wonders of the internet.

The ad campaign was an innovative partnership between laddie-mag Maxim and Pontiac to hype the carmaker's Solstice Roadster. Users logged onto the magazine's website and submitted pick-up lines to an image of Perry, actually an incarnation of the beautiful celebrity compiled from hundreds of pre-recorded videos. People with the best lines registered to win a car. Depending on the attempt, the program culled Perry's retort in real time from hundreds of pre-recorded responses. The site was flooded with users. According to Advertising Age, 16,000 people registered in its first three weeks.

The titillating Pontiac campaign was the successor to Burger King's Subservient Chicken, an online craze of its own. The two demonstrate the unique potential for online video ads. They lock millions of users to the sites, create a viral response by allowing fans to email the links to friends, and generate pop culture buzz. And of course, the online video ads paid off in higher chicken sandwich sales and registrations.

We shouldn't be surprised online video ads are becoming so popular. The streaming ads are a natural outgrowth of technological advances, evolving consumer habits and the perennial desire to gain traction with users. They are a much-needed advance in the maturation of the internet and will help ensure its future profitability. Fortunately, companies are realizing this. The online research aggregator eMarketer projects streaming video spending will nearly triple to $640 million in the next two years, and grow to $1.5 billion by 2010.

Three key factors have caused the rise of online video ads, and will guarantee the medium soars in 2006. 

1.) A tech-savvy culture
If the internet were a child, we could say it's leaving the awkward ugly stage and beginning to blossom. Let's face it, only a small number of consumers jumped on board with the latest technologies when they over-promised on the results or didn't work out the bugs. At first, technology was holding back advances, which held back the profits. I was like a parent, cringing and wincing at those banners and pop-ups. It was like seeing my youngster lurching through puberty. Hang in there little buddy, you're gonna make it! Now, technology is catching up with expectations, which entices a broader range of consumers and gives marketers a piece of the action. I'm beaming.

The rapid adoption of broadband internet access is the primary driver of online video ads. And it's only going to get better. The U.S. market hurdled a barrier to internet advertising this year when more than half of online households were using high-speed connections. A study by eMarketer estimates the number will continue to grow, from 42.3 million households in 2005 to 69.4 million in 2008. 

With all those high-speed connections out there, comScore Networks found consumers putting them to good use. More than 94 million people in the United States viewed a streaming video online in June of last year, according to comScore. The company recently released the first comprehensive assessment of the online streaming marketplace and, surprisingly, discovered that technology isn't just for youngsters anymore. Consumers between ages 35 and 54 accounted for more than 45 percent of online video ads watched in August 2005. It is 20 percent more likely that these mature adults will watch an online video than the typical internet user, the study found, and people between the ages of 25 and 34 are 12 percent more likely to watch a streaming video. These are hot marketing targets, and they love their streaming media.

"Contrary to public perception, it's not just 'college kids' or 'bleeding edge' internet users who are streaming videos," said Erin Hunter, senior vice president of comScore Networks media and entertainment solutions. Publishers are using innovations like high-quality video product clips, music videos, movie trailers -- even news broadcasts -- to engage consumers, Hunter said. "This creates a fantastic opportunity for advertisers to capitalize on what is now a mainstream audience," she added. 

2.) An evolving business mindset
The video ad pioneers have mainstream companies hot on their heels, jumping on the online video bandwagon. Todd Herman of MSN told Clickz.com that 23 of the top 50 brands have advertised on the site since its launch in August 2004. They include Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, General Motors and Johnson & Johnson.

Hunter, of comScore, says advertisers are "waking up" to the potential of online video ads. "People want more than a two-dimensional experience online, and this powerful medium now reaches everyone with engaging and interesting content," Hunter said.

The internet makes users part of the media experience. They aren't just viewers, as they are on television. They're participants. They're members of the online community. Advertisers are taking advantage of this increased engagement and loyalty. On New Year's Eve, MSN aired 30-second video ads from the entertainment and automotive industry throughout its live web cast from Times Square. The coverage allowed internet viewers to become part of the show-- sending emails that were included in the web cast.

Companies are also mainstreaming online video ads because they use quantitative data to connect consumers to products and services. This is the new "golden metric" to determine ROI, according to Diane Mermigas, contributing editor to The Hollywood Reporter. "It is impossible to counter the logic that paying 28 cents for a click on Google by a targeted consumer who might engage in an electronic transaction is not preferred to paying 10 cents per reader for a national magazine print ad that might not be seen," Mermigas writes.

Mermigas says traditional media outlets can cash in on the online action by moving consumers and advertisers to websites. In the future, look for more joint marketing sales between internet video advertising and traditional media outlets. Companies will integrate campaigns, combining online videos with TV spots run on cable networks. This naturally extends the campaign because video production costs were paid when the content was prepared for traditional media.

3.) Interactive, engaging and informative
Finding your ads' target audience is only a start, you have to lock them in to be effective, get them to engage. TV, radio and print have skinned this cat every which way for decades, but they're still handicapped. They're dealing with passive mediums and can't snoop while the consumer interacts with the pitch. The truth is, they don't know who's paying attention or for how long! Meanwhile, customers who check out the new online video ads by Ross-Simons not only get a behind-the-scenes peek at the styles of jewelry merchant, their interaction with the ad teaches marketers what works.

Ross-Simons just launched its streaming ads on its website. They star soap opera actress Lauren Koslow of NBC's "Days of Our Lives," and allow consumers to click on highlighted items to learn more or order the product. The videos engage customers and allow them to take action at the moment of interaction. It's more than an advertisement-- it's a prelude to a transaction.

Shot on digital video, there is little comparison between online advertisements and their passive cousins. Programmers can blend interactive concepts with the campaigns, like hidden "Easter eggs," flash, 3-D and high-resolution images. Many online ads include viral elements like emailing the ad to friends or allowing users to become part of the online community by posting comments on the site.

David Hallerman, senior analyst at eMarketer, said, "More than any other advertising format, internet video has the potential to blend hot marketing elements together-- branded entertainment, paid search, viral marketing, consumer generated media, behavioral targeting, website brand marketing and online gaming."

And every time a user emails an ad, clicks on an Easter egg or conducts a search, we're learning more about our target audience. We'll take that information and improve, giving consumers what they really want next time, and the time after that, and the time after that. The best part is that this is only the beginning.

Michael Jones, founder and president of Userplane, oversees the company’s application and business strategy, focusing on the future of live communications through the development of web applications. During the past two years, Userplane has gained recognition as a leading web-based application developer, in large part due to the success of its Flash-based Audio/Video Instant Communicator. Jones, one of the primary team members in the design and development of Instant Communicator, remains the primary manager of the application and its deployments.

Prior to founding Userplane, Jones was CEO of PBJ Digital, a national web development agency with clients ranging from Disney to Boeing. Among other activities, Jones has been a keynote speaker at the 2003 OFFF conference in Barcelona Spain, a featured presenter at Flash Forward 2003, and an advisor to a number of growing web communities. He earned his Bachelor of Arts in Marketing from the University of Oregon.